Status | Posted on Snapshot |
---|---|
Author | 5pence.eth |
The ENS DAO Working Group Rules place the responsibility for steward compensation on the Metagov working group.
Working Group Rules: [EP0.4] [Social] Proposal: Creation of Foundational Working Groups and Working Group Rules [EP12][Social] Working Group Rules
With the passing of this social proposal in Term 4, these two rules were added:
10.4. The Meta-Governance working group are responsible for defining standards for fair compensation ('Compensation Guidelines'). 10.5. The Compensation Guidelines shall be defined prior to the Nomination Window for each term and can only take effect for the following term.
In accordance with rule 10.5, This post outlines the proposed compensation structure for ENS DAO stewards during Term 6. The structure builds upon previous compensation models but includes several important changes. Notably, this compensation proposal will be put to a DAO vote for approval.
The total USDC compensation is the same as Term 5. The base compensation structure remains similar to previous terms, with some adjustments:
Role | Quantity | Per Steward Per Month | Per Steward Per Term | Total per Term |
---|---|---|---|---|
Steward | 6 | $4,000 | $24,000 | $288,000 |
Lead Steward | 3 | $5,500 | $33,000 | $198,000 |
Secretary | 1 | $5,500 | $33,000 | $66,000 |
Scribe | 1 | $3,000 | $18,000 | $36,000 |
Total | $588,000 |
(previous structure linked here for reference)
Key changes:
We are introducing a new structure for $ENS governance distribution to stewards:
Example calculation:
This structure ensures that stewards' token compensation aligns with their USDC compensation and incentivizes long-term commitment to the DAO.
For this social proposal to pass, the following quorum and voting requirements must be met:
Quorum: The proposal must receive a minimum of 1% of the total supply of $ENS (1 million votes) in the form of "Yes" and "Abstain" votes combined. "No" votes do not count towards quorum.
Approval: Once the quorum is reached, the proposal requires a simple majority (>50%) of "Yes" votes among the "Yes" and "No" votes to pass. "Abstain" votes do not count towards the approval calculation.
If approved, this structure will be implemented for Term 6. If not approved, the Metagovernance Working Group will reassess and propose an alternative structure based on feedback received.